Text Resize

Wednesday August 16, 2017

Private Letter Ruling

Grant to Charity Considered Unusual Grant

GiftLaw Note:
Charity is a tax-exempt nonprofit corporation under Sec. 501(c)(3) and is a public charity under Sec. 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). Charity promotes individual mental, moral, intellectual, artistic and physical improvement in a rural area. Charity runs annual mail campaigns to obtain funding from the general public. Charity also solicits memorial gifts through local funeral homes. Charity regularly meets the public support test. Charity has a large board of directors who have varied careers representative of the community; many of whom are elected. Charity will receive a grant at the death of Donor. Donor previously made a small grant several years ago. The grant is designated as a separate endowment to be used at the discretion of the board of directors to benefit residents of the rural area. Donor is not the creator of Charity and does not have any authority over Charity. Each of the directors on the board has no relationship with Donor, however, Charity's current president is also Donor's attorney. Charity is requesting that the grant be treated as an unusual grant, to protect Charity's publicly supported status.

In order for a charity to retain public charity status under Sec. 509(a), it must receive at least one third of its support from donors who give 2% or less of total support. Large bequests from a single individual can threaten a public charity's status; however, certain donations may be excluded from the public support test. Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) explains that a contribution can be excluded from the public support test if it is (1) attracted by reason of the publicly supported nature of the organization, (2) is unusual or unexpected in size and (3) would, by reason of its size, adversely affect the organization's publicly supported status. A facts and circumstances test found in Sec. 1.509(a)-3(c)(4) provides additional considerations when determining if a contribution may be excluded as an unusual grant. Many of the factors relate to the donor's relationship to the organization, the type of contribution made and the amount of public support the charity has historically solicited and received. Here, the Service determined that the bequest satisfies both tests. Therefore, it is an unusual grant and will not adversely affect Charity's publicly supported status.
PLR 201729025 Grant to Charity Considered Unusual Grant

07/21/2017 (04/28/2017)

Dear * * *:

We have considered your January 5, 2017 request for recognition of an unusual grant under Treasury Regulations section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and related provisions.

Based on the information provided, we have concluded that the proposed grant will constitute an unusual grant under section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and related provisions of the regulations. The basis for our conclusion is set forth below.

Facts


You were formed in the state of C in D. You are a nonprofit corporation exempt from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and classified as a public charity under Sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) of the Code. Your purpose is to promote the mental, moral, intellectual, artistic, and physical improvement of those in F which is a rural area in C.

You will receive a grant from B for x dollars. The grant will be a distribution of cash or investments from B and will take effect on the death of the grantor. A condition of the receipt of the grant requires that you will hold the funds in a separate endowment known as E. The grant will be used to benefit of residents in F at the discretion of your board of directors. You received one small grant for y dollars from B several years ago. B is not your creator and does not stand in a position of authority over you. You have carried on a successful program of public solicitation to attract public support and have consistently met the public support test. Your program of public solicitation includes conducting an annual mailing campaign to solicit contributions from the general public, and sending letters to the local funeral homes requesting they inform families of your existence so that they can make memorial gifts to you.

Furthermore, you have a large board including an elected county official, an elected member from the local board of education, an officer/employee of a local bank from your community, as well as three directors elected at large. Other than your current president serving as B's attorney, there are no other relationships between you and B.

Law


Treasury Regulations sections 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and 1.509(a)-3(c)(4) set forth the criteria for an unusual grant.

Treasury Regulations section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) states that, for purposes of applying the 2-percent limitation to determine whether the 33 1/3 percent-of-support test is satisfied, one or more contributions may be excluded from both the numerator and the denominator of the applicable percent-of-support fraction. The exclusion is generally intended to apply to substantial contributions or bequests from disinterested parties which:
  • are attracted by reason of the publicly supported nature of the organization;
  • are unusual or unexpected with respect to the amount thereof; and
  • would, by reason of their size, adversely affect the status of the organization as normally being publicly supported.
Treasury Regulations section 1.509(a)-3(c)(4) states that all pertinent facts and circumstances will be taken into consideration to determine whether a particular contribution may be excluded. No single factor will necessarily be determinative. Such factors may include:
  • Whether the contribution was made by a person who
    a. created the organization
    b. previously contributed a substantial part of its support or endowment
    c. stood in a position of authority with respect to the organization, such as a foundation manager within the meaning of section 4946(b)
    d. directly or indirectly exercised control over the organization, or
    e. was in a relationship described in Internal Revenue Code section 4946(a)(1)(C) through 4946(a)(1)(G) with someone listed in bullets a, b, c, or d above.
    A contribution made by a person described in a. - e. is ordinarily given less favorable consideration than a contribution made by others not described above.
  • Whether the contribution was a bequest or an inter vivos transfer. A bequest will ordinarily be given more favorable consideration than an inter vivos transfer.
  • Whether the contribution was in the form of cash, readily marketable securities, or assets which further the exempt purposes of the organization, such as a gift of a painting to a museum.
  • Whether (except in the case of a new organization) prior to the receipt of the particular contribution, the organization (a) has carried on an actual program of public solicitation and exempt activities and (b) has been able to attract a significant amount of public support.
  • Whether the organization may reasonably be expected to attract a significant amount of public support after the particular contribution. Continued reliance on unusual grants to fund an organization's current operating expenses (as opposed to providing new endowment funds) may be evidence that the organization cannot reasonably be expected to attract future public support.
  • Whether, prior to the year in which the particular contribution was received, the organization met the one-third support test described in section 1.509(a)-3(a)(2) without the benefit of any exclusions of unusual grants pursuant to section 1.509-3(c)(3);
  • Whether the organization has a representative governing body as described in Treasury Regulations section 1.509(a)-3(d)(3)(i); and
  • Whether material restrictions or conditions within the meaning of Treasury Regulations section 1.507-2(a)(7) have been imposed by the transferor upon the transferee in connection with such transfer.

Application of Law


Based on the information provided, the proposed grant meets the requirements of Treasury Regulations section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) because the grant is from a disinterested party, and:
  • The grant was attracted by reason of your publicly supported nature:
  • The grant is unusual or unexpected with respect to the amount:
  • The grant will adversely affect your status as normally being publicly supported.
The grant meets the requirements of Treasury Regulations section 1.509(a)-3(c)(4) based on the following facts and circumstances.
a) The grant was not made by a person who created you or who previously contributed a substantial amount of your support. The grantor also does not stand in a position of authority with respect to you and does not exercise control over you.
b) The grant is a bequest and is in the form of cash or investments.
c) You have carried on an actual program of public solicitation, have exempt activities, and have attracted a significant amount of public support over the years.
d) You have met the public support test in past years.
e) Because you have relied on public support in the past, it can be assumed that you will be able to maintain that level of public support in the future.
f) You have a large representative governing body.
In addition, no material restrictions or conditions within the meaning of Treasury Regulations section 1.507-2(a)(7) have been imposed by the transferor upon the transferee in connection with such transfer.

For all the forgoing reasons, the grant should be characterized as an unusual grant within the meaning of Treasury Regulations section 1.509(a)-3(c)(4).

If you have any questions, please contact the person listed in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely,

Stephen A. Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Published August 11, 2017

Previous Articles

Foundation's Set-Aside of Funds Approved

Commercial Activity Sinks Marine Science Organization's Exemption

No UBTI on Endowment Units to Trust

Foundation's Set-Aside Approved

Pipe Manufacturer Fails to Qualify for Exemption

scriptsknown